12. Upper Gastrointestinal Dilation and Tubal Prosthesis Insertion
INTRODUCTION
RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTER REFERENCES
n = number of cases where information was provided

 

METHODS OF DILATION, COMPLICATIONS AND DEATH

Key points
X-ray control was used in 63% of procedures that included a tubal prosthesis insertion.

Oesophageal perforation during or within 48 hours occurred in 2.8% of cases.

Death within 48 hours occurred in 0.7% of cases.


Methods of dilation

Table 72. Methods of dilation of the oesophagus
Method of dilation
Total
(%)
Graduated bougie
1,362
(49)
Forced pneumatic balloon
191
(7)
Through the endoscope balloon
861
(31)
Two methods used
9
(<1)
None
369
(13)
Sub-total
2,792
Not answered
153
(5)
Total
2,945

Table 73. X-ray screening for the types of procedure
Type of procedure
Yes
No
Sub-total
Not answered
Total
Flexible endoscopic dilation
569
1,458
2,027
190
2,217
Flexible endoscopic dilation followed by tubal prosthesis
34
19
53
11
64
Flexible endoscopic insertion of tubal prosthesis
320
153
473
23
496
Rigid endoscopic dilation
36
82
118
30
148
Rigid endoscopic dilation followed by tubal prosthesis
5
4
9
0
9
Endoscopic insertion of tubal prosthesis other than oesophagus
6
3
9
2
11
Total
970
1,719
2,686
256
2,945

As seen in Table 73, X-ray screening was used in 29% (603/2,080) of flexible endoscopic dilation procedures and in 63% (354/526) of procedures that included insertion of a tubal prosthesis. BSG guidelines recommend that radiographic screening is helpful when the stricture is tortuous or complex or associated with a large hiatus hernia or diverticulae, and when difficulty is encountered passing the guidewire1. NCEPOD advisors consider X-ray control mandatory for dilation using a guidewire if the endoscope cannot be passed into the stomach, i.e. the guidewire cannot be placed under direct vision. X-ray control was thought
to be highly desirable for placement of a tubal prosthesis, and that not to use it is unwise. They also believe that X-ray control is not required for routine endoscopic oesophageal dilation if flexible tipped dilators are used.


Complications (back to top)

During the procedure 1.5% (45/2,945) of patients had one or more of the complications listed on the questionnaire (Table 74).

Table 74. Complications during the procedure (answers may be multiple)
Complication
Total
n = 45
Perforated oesophagus followed by surgery
12
Perforated oesophagus followed by medical treatment
18
Oesophageal haemorrhage
10
Cardio-respiratory arrest
1
Pulmonary aspiration
1
Chest infection
5
Sepsis
2
Total
49

In the 48 hour period after the procedure 2.5% (73/2,945) of patients had one or more of the complications listed on the questionnaire (Table 75).

Table 75. Complications within 48 hours after the procedure (answers may be multiple)
Complication
Total
n = 73
Perforated oesophagus followed by surgery
35
Perforated oesophagus followed by medical treatment
18
Oesophageal haemorrhage
4
Cardio-respiratory arrest
3
Respiratory arrest
3
Pulmonary aspiration
4
Chest infection
6
Sepsis
3
Total
76

The perforation rate for patients with malignant disease was 4.3% (45/1,052) and for benign disease 2% (35/1,784).

Table 76. Dilation methods and oesophageal perforation during or within 48 hours
of procedure
Dilation method
Total
Perforation
None
369
15
Graduated bougie
1,362
27
Forced pneumatic balloon
191
8
Through the endoscope balloon
861
21
Two methods used
9
0
Sub-total
2,792
71
Not answered
153
10
Total
2,945
81

In this study, a total of 2.8% (81/2,945) of patients suffered oesophageal perforation in association with upper GI dilation and/or insertion of oesophageal tubal prosthesis during
or within 48 hours of the procedure (Table 76). There was a trend for oesophageal tubal prostheses without dilation and oesophageal dilation using a forced pneumatic balloon to be associated with a greater incidence of oesophageal perforation than the graduated bougie or through the endoscope method. The findings suggest that a larger national audit of specific techniques and equipment may be indicated.


Death (back to top)

Where the outcome was known, 0.7% (20/2,828) of patients died within 48 hours of the procedure (Table 77).

Table 77. Dilation method and death
Dilation method
Died
Survived
Unknown
Sub-total
Not answered
Total
None
4
328
21
353
16
369
Graduated bougie
11
1,227
74
1,312
50
1,362
Forced pneumatic balloon
2
165
11
178
13
191
Through the endoscopic balloon
2
801
28
831
30
861
Two methods used
0
7
1
8
1
9
Sub-total
19
2,528
135
2,682
110
2,792
Not answered
1
137
8
146
7
153
Total
20
2,665
143
2,828
117
2,945

(back to top)