12. Upper Gastrointestinal Dilation and Tubal Prosthesis Insertion
INTRODUCTION
METHODS OF DIALTION, COMPLICATIONS AND DEATH
RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTER REFERENCES
n = number of cases where information was provided

 

ANALGESIA AND ANAESTHESIA

Table 71. Analgesia and anaesthesia used for the procedure
None
LA
Sedation
GA
Sub-total
Not answered
Total
Flexible endoscopic dilation
18
728
1,252
202
2,200
17
2,217
Flexible endoscopic dilation followed by tubal prosthesis
0
17
41
6
64
0
64
Flexible endoscopic insertion of tubal prosthesis
4
136
294
56
490
6
496
Rigid endoscopic dilation
0
2
13
131
146
2
148
Rigid endoscopic dilation followed by tubal prosthesis
0
0
1
7
8
1
9
Endoscopic insertion of tubal prosthesis other than oesophagus
0
4
4
3
11
0
11
Total
22
887
1,605
405
2,919
26
2,945
*Local anaesthesia = topical local anaesthesia to the oropharynx.

Although clinicians were invited to give multiple answers to the type of anaesthesia/analgesia used, interestingly, none did. It can only be assumed therefore
that none used a combined topical local anaesthesia with either sedation or general anaesthesia. From Table 71, 58% (1,587/2,754) of the flexible endoscopic procedures
were performed under sedation, 32% (881/2,754) under topical local anaesthesia and 10% (264/2,754) under a general anaesthetic. 9% (14/154) of the rigid endoscopic procedures were performed under sedation and 90% (138/154) under a general anaesthetic. The high use of general anaesthesia for rigid endoscopic procedures may reflect the discomfort of
the technique which is being used mainly by thoracic and ENT surgeons on lists with an attendant anaesthetist.

(back to top)